George Lucas Interview with Charlie Rose! Very intersting talk
View Reddit by imthenewhere – View Source
George Lucas Interview with Charlie Rose! Very intersting talk
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Cookie | Duration | Description |
---|---|---|
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Is this the infamous “white slavers” interview
All of that stuff about how he wrote one giant script that he divided into three parts and “then the first part didn’t really work” so he took the ending of the third part (i.e. Return of the Jedi, with the Death Star blowing up) and “put it on the first” is all such nonesense.
That never, ever happened: George Lucas is flat-out lying to anyone listening, and does so self-consciously (in a 2008 letter to the showrunners of Lost he admits this is all make-belief) and without any real reason because he’s already sold Star Wars and effectivelly retired.
There are other bits in this interview that come off as affectations – all the talk of mythology, the talk of making “personal films” – and then there’s obviously the White Slavers comment.
I probably like more of George Lucas’ films than most do, but all this lying and revisionist history is really hurting his legacy. And its not just his public persona: how can a man who thinks so little of his listeners’ intelligence as to think they’d believe such nonesense, not also think too little of his viewers’ intelligence when he makes a film?