[ad_1]
Here’s an example. I see it on movies with gigantic budgets, it’s very strange. Is it because they often make the posters after shooting is done and can’t get the actors to pose? Or is it to cause it’s more eye catching than a regular picture of a person? Ive always wondered
[ad_2]
View Reddit by fucktheworldman – View Source
Get the guys that did all those Polish knock off posters for Hollywood flicks in the 80’s. They’ll fix this.
It’s cheaper. Literally the main reason.
I thought that was Dave Franco and Danny Devito lol
Sebastian Maniscalco is Italian?!
I used to think it was airbrushing for vanity’s sake, but I’ve thought about it more and I think, given that it seems to be more often on ‘ensemble’ style posters (ie photos taken at different times in different places or drawn from different scenes), that it’s them trying to equalise the light.
There are worse….
[Much](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTQ0ODM2MzAzMV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNTk3NDA2MjE@._V1_.jpg) … [much](https://www.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/645b4e8a47f82_zNfvxTI_d__700.webp)… [much](https://media-cache.cinematerial.com/p/500x/jfdy1glx/i-am-wrath-movie-cover.jpg?v=1461393487) … [worse](https://images.bauerhosting.com/legacy/empire-legacy/uploaded/worst-movie-poster-2014-chef.jpg?auto=format&w=1440&q=80)
It reminds me of the YouTube open mouth faces for the clip.
The actors weren’t paid enough for a photo shoot.
This is an example of “work smarter not harder”
That’s just how Ders looks.